Enhancement in Rural Participation -Faculty Development programme -Wardha
Faculty Development programme - Enhancement in Rural Participation
Day1:
Wardha, March 19, 2018, Seven day, Faculty enhancement program in rural
participation under the auspices of Mahatma Gandhi Fuji Guruji Social Work
Study Center and National Rural Institute Council, Hyderabad of Mahatma Gandhi International
Hindi University, jointly organized this FDP. Participants from Maharashtra,
West Bengal, Haryana, Bihar, Tamilnadu-Coimbatore, Nagpur University, Bhagalpur
University and Haryana participated. Vice Chancellor Prof. Anand Vardhan Sharma,
Mahatma Gandhi Hindi University presided over the inaugural session followed by
Dr. Mithilesh Kumar.
The program started with lighting the lamp. Giving the welcome statement, Center Director Prof. Manoj Kumar said that it is expected that in these seven days we will complete the Faculty Promotion Program successfully. The social concern of the course should be clearly understood by the faculties. Today the courses and society are unable to connect with each other. The curriculum must be tailored to the needs of the society and to lead society in a better direction.
NCRI- DN of the National Council of Rural Institutes Deban Das said on the above occasion that NCRI is working since 1995. Its purpose is to connect rural India's universities with rural needs. Its purpose is to develop a syllabus in conformity with it and establish the identity of the rural community.
In his presidential
statement, Prof. Anand Vardhan Sharma said that it is a matter of great
curiosity that Mahatma Gandhi International Hindi University and NCRI are
jointly organizing a seven-day program. Let me tell you that this work is a
“Great Job”. There are many programs throughout the year in the university
which leave a big impression. On this occasion, he said that this workshop
organized in Mahatma Gandhi and the workshop of Vinoba will help develop
courses related to rural areas and rural development. He expressed his good
wishes for the success of this workshop, he expressed his gratitude at the end
of the inaugural session, University Registrar Kader Nawaz Khan said that
hopefully the teachers of society work from different parts of the country will
take new experiences from this workshop.
Prof. Sr. Tukadoji Maharaj, Department of Postgraduate Sociology University,
Nagpur. Addressed the first discussion session on 'introduction and sensitivity
of rural community', Ashok Borkar explained the ancient social structure with
reference to archaeological surveys. Archaeological remains and give us
residues of productive species. There are also residues of Mother Goddess, Yaksha-Yakshani,
after that, we can gather the information of old society, even from Vedic
literature and also information about the village of Vaishno-Kshatriyas. We
also received important information about tribal villages, he said. Communal
understanding of Gods and Panchayat system is very strong still in place. He
said that in village community, there is a community spirit in it. People of
the village live normal lives. Agriculture is their main business. There is a
common expression in the rural community. In every round of India, the maximum
emphasis has been given on the social system. Our focus and concentration must
be on agricultural problem.
In the 18th century, Mahatma Phule has firmly held his statement on this. Before the British came into India, India considered the village as a self-sufficient unit. Famous sociologist Shyamacharan Dubey believed that, the villages in India were not autocomplete. In many cases these villages were dependent on each other. Dubey had said the above words on the basis of the conclusions of his important study of rural system. From the views of Western sociologist Robert Redfield, S.C. Dubey's ideas were relative.
And the second most
important unit is the caste system is the domestic family, which depends on the
village's economic, social, political, cultural and religious issues. The
relatives of his family also play an important role in this. Similarly, the
caste structure also works and its location is more important than family. He
said that many schemes of the government cannot meet its goal; its roots are
also rooted in caste system. Even today in the villages, superstitious
violence, caste violence and preservation system are maintained. This was
followed by exploitation of laborers in the villages even before. Before the
arrival of the British in India, the trail of textiles and leather industry was
spread in India as well as agriculture. That is why everyone used to live in
some way. Joint families in India were friendly to the farming system. There is
a need to understand the country's current agricultural crisis in its mirror.
He said
that before the arrival of Gandhi, India's independence movement was centered
on the city. Gandhi changed the center and centered the village. Gandhi
believed that before the arrival of the British, the villages of India were
prosperous and prosperous. India's independence for Gandhi meant the autonomy
of the villages. There was a different vision in respect to the villages of Dr.
Ambedkar and Nehru. According to them, the people in the villages, did not have
any rights. The village was not a Republican system of
government, because the village was dominated by the dominant castes.
The dominant resources of upper caste nations have been dominated by economic
resources and political systems. Nehru used to consider caste based
classification as useless for modern society. Caste system has been responsible
for the abuses of human rights as well as inequality of opportunities. While
Dr. Ambedkar talks of political democracy as well as social democracy Dr.
Ambedkar termed Indian civilization as Hindu civilization, saying there was no
place for untouchables. The majority of the Constituent Assembly wanted that
the village became the unit of independent India, Ambedkar was against it.
Post Lunch Session:
Discussion session
started on 'Economic and Political Structure of Rural Society'. Subject
specialist, Nagpur University Retired Prof. Srinivas Khandewala started his
talk with some questions and said that is the political structure of Indian
society sufficient? Similarly, is the economic structure of Indian society
satisfactory? It requires serious discussion on this. The political aspect is
created as a result of the need to establish control of society. The desired
development of the uncontrolled society is not possible; there is a possibility
of scarcity, directionlessness in it. The monarchy was built to meet this
requirement. After independence, India accepted democracy. Earlier, in the
olden days, the common people in the monarchy believed so much that after the
death of the king, the king's little child was accepted as a king. Then there
was a system to educate and train the king. He said that Indian society has not
yet been completely democratic. There are separate advisory committees of
different departments for suggestion to the President
In
India even today, the lack of maturity of this kind can be seen in the
decision-making process. The result is that the general public has to suffer.
Therefore, lack of public policy and government policy decreases. Meanwhile,
there should be complete arrangement of coordination. In the decision-making
process of democracy, people come from different groups. There is a clear relationship
between people's aspirations and government's responsibility. These things
determine the constitution. The Constitution also determines the direction of
future of the country. In the context of the Indian Constitution, in a country
of cultural, religious, ethnic, and tribal pluralism, it is necessary to ensure
that all welfare can be ensured in the Constitution. The President of the
United States George Bush had expressed during his visit to India how his
differences were adjusted in his constitution. Whereas in other countries of
the world there is no such problem as there is less population here. Indian
politicians should also have knowledge of Indian culture, religion and history,
so that they can combine Indian diversity.
He further said
that who creates the political structure? Whose influence it, are all satisfied
with it? Discussion is also required on this. Discussion is also necessary on
whether all the constitution is satisfied. Because society puts pressure on it.
Presently the transfer of political power is being transferred to the market.
In the period of economic liberalization, the price of important things such as
education, health, the market is determining. Work of public welfare today is
offering a market offering. Such economic decisions are being taken in the
country, which cannot be called democratic in any sense. Failure has been made
on the front of the benefits of the note-offs that were counted. At the same
time, the current form of GST is proving harmful to the common man and it is
promoting corruption. Today, most important constitutional institutions seem helpless;
it is a very dangerous situation for democracy and in terms of public interest.
Reference Source: Dr. Mukesh
Kumar, Naresh Gautam, Descent Sahu, Sudhir Kumar, Ashu Buddhist and Sonam Buddh